Very strong evidence in favor of quantum mechanics and against local hidden variables from a Bayesian analysis
Yanwu Gu, Weijun Li, Michael Evans, and Berthold-Georg Englert

TL;DR
This paper uses Bayesian analysis to evaluate four recent experiments, providing strong statistical evidence supporting quantum mechanics over local hidden variable theories, thereby reinforcing the nonlocal nature of quantum phenomena.
Contribution
It applies Bayesian statistical methods to experimental data, offering a robust quantitative assessment favoring quantum mechanics over local hidden variables.
Findings
Each experiment provides strong evidence for quantum mechanics.
Bayesian analysis confirms the rejection of local hidden variable theories.
Supports the nonlocal interpretation of quantum phenomena.
Abstract
The data of four recent experiments --- conducted in Delft, Vienna, Boulder, and Munich with the aim of refuting nonquantum hidden-variables alternatives to the quantum-mechanical description --- are evaluated from a Bayesian perspective of what constitutes evidence in statistical data. We find that each of the experiments provides strong, or very strong, evidence in favor of quantum mechanics and against the nonquantum alternatives. This Bayesian analysis supplements the previous non-Bayesian ones, which refuted the alternatives on the basis of small p-values, but could not support quantum mechanics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
