On Dividing a Rectangle
Robert Dumitru, Quinn Perian, Alexander Nealey, Mohammed Mannan, Eddie, Beck, Nick Castro, David Gay, Dipen Mehta, Anish Pandya, Ejay Cho

TL;DR
This paper provides a new elementary proof demonstrating that an arbitrary rectangle cannot be divided into three congruent, non-rectangular regions, addressing a historical geometric problem.
Contribution
It introduces a novel elementary proof confirming the impossibility of dissecting a rectangle into three congruent, non-rectangular parts, resolving a longstanding question.
Findings
Proves the impossibility of dividing a rectangle into 3 congruent, non-rectangular regions
Provides a new elementary proof of this geometric fact
Addresses a historical problem in geometric dissections
Abstract
This paper deals with the history of the following problem: "Can an arbitrary rectangle be dissected into 3 non-rectangular congruent regions?" We present a new elementary proof that the answer is indeed no.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · Advanced Mathematical Theories · History and Theory of Mathematics
