What Stands-in for a Missing Tool? A Prototypical Grounded Knowledge-based Approach to Tool Substitution
Madhura Thosar, Christian A. Mueller, Sebastian Zug

TL;DR
This paper proposes a grounded knowledge-based method for robot tool substitution in dynamic environments, validated through experiments that closely matched expert choices in most scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a novel grounded knowledge-based approach for tool substitution and demonstrates its effectiveness through experimental validation.
Findings
Approach matched expert choices in 91% of scenarios
Validated with 22 substitution scenarios
Effective in dynamic, real-world environments
Abstract
When a robot is operating in a dynamic environment, it cannot be assumed that a tool required to solve a given task will always be available. In case of a missing tool, an ideal response would be to find a substitute to complete the task. In this paper, we present a proof of concept of a grounded knowledge-based approach to tool substitution. In order to validate the suitability of a substitute, we conducted experiments involving 22 substitution scenarios. The substitutes computed by the proposed approach were validated on the basis of the experts' choices for each scenario. Our evaluation showed, in 20 out of 22 scenarios (91%), the approach identified the same substitutes as experts.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobot Manipulation and Learning · AI in Service Interactions · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
