An Economic Analysis of Privacy Protection and Statistical Accuracy as Social Choices
John M. Abowd, Ian M. Schmutte

TL;DR
This paper models the trade-off between privacy protection and statistical accuracy in data publication as an economic resource allocation problem, proposing an optimal operating point based on marginal costs and benefits.
Contribution
It introduces an economic framework for balancing privacy and accuracy in statistical agencies using differential privacy principles.
Findings
Guides decision-making in privacy-accuracy trade-offs
Illustrates the framework with U.S. statistical programs
Highlights need for understanding willingness-to-pay for privacy and accuracy
Abstract
Statistical agencies face a dual mandate to publish accurate statistics while protecting respondent privacy. Increasing privacy protection requires decreased accuracy. Recognizing this as a resource allocation problem, we propose an economic solution: operate where the marginal cost of increasing privacy equals the marginal benefit. Our model of production, from computer science, assumes data are published using an efficient differentially private algorithm. Optimal choice weighs the demand for accurate statistics against the demand for privacy. Examples from U.S.\ statistical programs show how our framework can guide decision-making. Further progress requires a better understanding of willingness-to-pay for privacy and statistical accuracy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic and Environmental Valuation · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Local Government Finance and Decentralization
