Lexicosyntactic Inference in Neural Models
Aaron Steven White, Rachel Rudinger, Kyle Rawlins, Benjamin Van Durme

TL;DR
This paper examines how neural models handle lexicosyntactic inferences, specifically in factuality prediction, revealing systematic errors and providing a new dataset for evaluation.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive factuality judgment dataset for English clause-embedding verbs and analyzes neural models' performance on this task.
Findings
Neural models exhibit systematic errors in factuality prediction.
The dataset covers all English clause-embedding verbs in various contexts.
Current models struggle with certain lexicosyntactic inferences.
Abstract
We investigate neural models' ability to capture lexicosyntactic inferences: inferences triggered by the interaction of lexical and syntactic information. We take the task of event factuality prediction as a case study and build a factuality judgment dataset for all English clause-embedding verbs in various syntactic contexts. We use this dataset, which we make publicly available, to probe the behavior of current state-of-the-art neural systems, showing that these systems make certain systematic errors that are clearly visible through the lens of factuality prediction.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification
