Sharing within limits: Partial resource pooling in loss systems
Anvitha Nandigam, Suraj Jog, D. Manjunath, Jayakrishnan Nair, B. J., Prabhu

TL;DR
This paper introduces partial resource sharing models for loss systems, demonstrating they can be mutually beneficial and analyzing their properties and optimal configurations using bargaining theory and large system approximations.
Contribution
It formalizes partial resource sharing models, proves the existence of beneficial configurations for all loads, and explores Pareto optimal sharing strategies.
Findings
Existence of beneficial partial sharing configurations for all load scenarios.
Pareto frontier includes configurations where one provider shares all resources.
Full pooling may not always be Pareto optimal.
Abstract
Fragmentation of expensive resources, e.g., spectrum for wireless services, between providers can introduce inefficiencies in resource utilisation and worsen overall system performance. In such cases, resource pooling between independent service providers can be used to improve performance. However, for providers to agree to pool their resources, the arrangement has to be mutually beneficial. The traditional notion of resource pooling, which implies complete sharing, need not have this property. For example, under full pooling, one of the providers may be worse off and hence have no incentive to participate. In this paper, we propose partial resource sharing models as a generalization of full pooling, which can be configured to be beneficial to all participants. We formally define and analyze two partial sharing models between two service providers, each of which is an Erlang-B loss…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
