The Evolution of the HeII-Ionizing Background at Redshifts 2.3<z<3.8 Inferred from a Statistical Sample of 24 HST/COS HeII Ly$\alpha$ Absorption Spectra
G\'abor Worseck (Universit\"at Potsdam), Frederick B. Davies, (University of California Santa Barbara), Joseph F. Hennawi (University of, California Santa Barbara), J. Xavier Prochaska (University of California, Santa Cruz)

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of the helium ionization background between redshifts 2.3 and 3.8 using a large sample of HST/COS HeII Lyα absorption spectra, revealing increased optical depth and fluctuations indicative of ongoing HeII reionization.
Contribution
It provides the first statistical analysis of HeII effective optical depth at z>3.5 and develops a method to estimate the HeII photoionization rate from absorption data.
Findings
Median τ_eff increases from ~2 at z=2.7 to >5 at z>3.
Significant sightline-to-sightline variance in τ_eff at z>2.74.
HeII photoionization rate decreases by a factor of ~5 from z~2.6 to z~3.1.
Abstract
We present measurements of the large-scale (~40 comoving Mpc) effective optical depth of HeII Ly absorption, , at 2.54<z<3.86 toward 16 HeII-transparent quasars observed with the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), to characterize the ionization state of helium in the intergalactic medium (IGM). We provide the first statistical sample of measurements in six signal-to-noise ratio >3 HeII sightlines at z>3.5, and study the redshift evolution and sightline-to-sightline variance of in 24 HeII sightlines. We confirm an increase of the median from ~2 at z=2.7 to >5 at z>3, and a scatter in that increases with redshift. The z>3.5 HeII absorption is predominantly saturated, but isolated narrow ( km/s) transmission spikes indicate patches of reionized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
