Galaxy Ellipticity Measurements in the Near-Infrared for Weak Lensing
Bomee Lee, Ranga-Ram Chary, and Edward L. Wright

TL;DR
This study shows that near-infrared imaging, despite lower resolution, can provide as precise or better galaxy ellipticity measurements than optical imaging for weak lensing, especially at higher redshifts.
Contribution
It demonstrates that NIR imaging can improve ellipticity measurements in weak lensing surveys, highlighting the advantages of NIR over optical in terms of galaxy smoothness and surface brightness.
Findings
NIR and optical imaging perform similarly in ellipticity measurement at 0.5 < z < 3.
NIR-selected sources are 1.4 times denser at z > 1.0, reducing measurement errors.
NIR imaging yields more precise ellipticities despite lower resolution.
Abstract
We investigate the value of the near-infrared imaging from upcoming surveys for constraining the ellipticities of galaxies. We select galaxies between 0.5 < z < 3 that are brighter than expected Euclid sensitivity limits from the GOODS-S and N fields in CANDELS. The co-added CANDELS/HST V+I and J+H images are degraded in resolution and sensitivity to simulate Euclid-quality optical and near-infrared (NIR) images. We then run GALFIT on these simulated images and find that optical and NIR provide similar performance in measuring galaxy ellipticities at redshifts 0.5 < z < 3. At z > 1.0, the NIR-selected source density is higher by a factor of 1.4 and therefore the standard error in NIR-derived ellipticities is about 30% smaller, implying a more precise ellipticity measurement. The good performance of the NIR is mainly because galaxies have an intrinsically smoother light distribution in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
