Frame-validity games and lower bounds on the complexity of modal axioms
Philippe Balbiani, David Fern\'andez-Duque, Andreas Herzig, Petar, Iliev

TL;DR
This paper introduces frame-equivalence games to analyze the complexity of modal formulas defining frame-properties, establishing lower bounds and optimality results for well-known modal axioms.
Contribution
It develops a novel game-theoretic approach to measure and prove lower bounds on the complexity of modal axioms defining frame-properties.
Findings
Lower bounds on size, depth, and symbol occurrences for modal axioms.
Optimality of certain axioms within their class of frame-defining formulas.
Applicability of the method to well-known modal axioms.
Abstract
We introduce frame-equivalence games tailored for reasoning about the size, modal depth, number of occurrences of symbols and number of different propositional variables of modal formulae defining a given frame-property. Using these games, we prove lower bounds on the above measures for a number of well-known modal axioms; what is more, for some of the axioms, we show that they are optimal among the formulae defining the respective class of frames.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
