Viable Inflation in Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity and Reconstruction from Observational Indices
S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou

TL;DR
This paper explores inflationary models within Einstein Gauss-Bonnet gravity, demonstrating how non-trivial couplings can produce viable inflationary scenarios compatible with observations and introducing a reconstruction method based on observational indices.
Contribution
It analyzes the impact of Gauss-Bonnet coupling on inflationary dynamics and proposes a bottom-up reconstruction technique for Einstein Gauss-Bonnet theories from observational data.
Findings
Viable inflationary models can be achieved with non-trivial Gauss-Bonnet couplings.
Canonical scalar fields with cubic and quartic potentials are not phenomenologically acceptable.
The exponential potential model can naturally exit inflation due to Gauss-Bonnet effects.
Abstract
In this paper the focus is on inflationary dynamics in the context of Einstein Gauss-Bonnet gravitational theories. We investigate the implications of the slow-roll condition on the slow-roll indices and we investigate how the inflationary dynamical evolution is affected by the presence of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling to the scalar field. For exemplification of our analysis we investigate how the dynamics of inflationary cubic, quartic order and also exponential scalar potentials are affected by the non-trivial Gauss-Bonnet coupling to the scalar field. As we demonstrate it is possible to obtain a viable phenomenology compatible with the observational data, although the canonical scalar field theory with cubic and quartic order potentials does not yield phenomenologically acceptable results. In addition, with regard to the exponential potential example, the Einstein Gauss-Bonnet extension…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
