Can GDP measurement be further improved? Data revision and reconciliation
Jan P.A.M. Jacobs, Samad Sarferaz, Jan-Egbert Sturm, Simon van, Norden

TL;DR
This paper introduces GDP++, a new method that combines multiple data releases to improve the accuracy of U.S. real GDP growth estimates by distinguishing between news and noise errors, especially before economic downturns.
Contribution
It develops a novel approach to incorporate multiple data vintages, enhancing GDP measurement accuracy without relying on strong assumptions used in previous methods.
Findings
GDP++ fits data better than previous measures
GDE data releases are more informative than GDI
Multiple data releases are crucial before the Great Recession
Abstract
Recent years have seen many attempts to combine expenditure-side estimates of U.S. real output (GDE) growth with income-side estimates (GDI) to improve estimates of real GDP growth. We show how to incorporate information from multiple releases of noisy data to provide more precise estimates while avoiding some of the identifying assumptions required in earlier work. This relies on a new insight: using multiple data releases allows us to distinguish news and noise measurement errors in situations where a single vintage does not. Our new measure, GDP++, fits the data better than GDP+, the GDP growth measure of Aruoba et al. (2016) published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadephia. Historical decompositions show that GDE releases are more informative than GDI, while the use of multiple data releases is particularly important in the quarters leading up to the Great Recession.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact · Climate Change Policy and Economics
