Properties and redshift evolution of star-forming galaxies with high [OIII]/[OII] ratios with MUSE at 0.28<z<0.85
M. Paalvast, A. Verhamme, L.A. Straka, J. Brinchmann, E.C. Herenz, D., Carton, M.L.P. Gunawardhana, L.A. Boogaard, S. Cantalupo, T. Contini, B., Epinat, H. Inami, R.A. Marino, M.V. Maseda, L. Michel-Dansac, S. Muzahid, T., Nanayakkara, G. Pezzulli, J. Richard, J. Schaye

TL;DR
This study investigates the properties and evolution of star-forming galaxies with high [OIII]/[OII] ratios across redshifts 0.28 to 0.85 using MUSE data, revealing insights into their metallicity, age, and potential as Lyman continuum emitters.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of high O32 ratio galaxies over this redshift range, identifying their properties, incidence rates, and potential as LyC emitters, with no significant evolution observed.
Findings
15 out of 406 galaxies are extreme oxygen emitters with O32>4.
No significant redshift evolution in the fraction of high O32 emitters.
Most extreme O32 galaxies are consistent with low metallicity nebular models.
Abstract
We present a study of the [OIII]5007/[OII]3727 (O32) ratios of star-forming galaxies drawn from MUSE data spanning a redshift range 0.28<z<0.85. Recently discovered Lyman continuum (LyC) emitters have extremely high oxygen line ratios: O32>4. Here we aim to understand the properties and the occurrences of galaxies with such high line ratios. Combining data from several MUSE GTO programmes, we select a population of star-forming galaxies with bright emission lines, from which we draw 406 galaxies for our analysis based on their position in the z-dependent star formation rate (SFR) - stellar mass (M*) plane. Out of this sample 15 are identified as extreme oxygen emitters based on their O32 ratios (3.7%) and 104 galaxies have O32>1 (26%). Our analysis shows no significant correlation between M*, SFR, and the distance from the SFR-M* relation with O32. We find a decrease in the fraction of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
