A model of second-order arithmetic satisfying AC but not DC
Sy-David Friedman, Victoria Gitman, Vladimir Kanovei

TL;DR
This paper constructs a second-order arithmetic model satisfying the Axiom of Choice but not Dependent Choice for certain assertions, revealing limitations of reflection principles in set theory.
Contribution
It demonstrates the existence of a β-model of second-order arithmetic with AC but failing DC for a specific class, confirming a conjecture of Stephen Simpson.
Findings
Existence of a β-model satisfying AC but not DC for a Π^1_2 assertion
Reflection Principle can fail in models of ZFC^-
Rediscovery of a known result by the authors
Abstract
We show that there is a -model of second-order arithmetic in which the choice scheme holds, but the dependent choice scheme fails for a -assertion, confirming a conjecture of Stephen Simpson. We obtain as a corollary that the Reflection Principle, stating that every formula reflects to a transitive set, can fail in models of . This work is a rediscovery by the first two authors of a result obtained by the third author.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
