In situ measurement of MWA primary beam variation using ORBCOMM
J. L. B. Line (1,9), B. McKinley (2,9), J. Rasti (1,9), M. Bhardwaj, (1,9), R. B. Wayth (2,9), R. L. Webster (1,9), D. Ung (2), D. Emrich (2), L., Horsley (2), A. Beardsley (3), B. Crosse (2), T. M. O. Franzen (2), B. M., Gaensler (4,9,5), M. Johnston-Hollitt (2)

TL;DR
This study presents the first in situ measurements of MWA antenna beam shapes using ORBCOMM satellites, validating models and highlighting tile-to-tile variations critical for EoR 21 cm line detection.
Contribution
It introduces a novel in situ measurement method for MWA primary beams using satellite passes, providing validation for existing models and revealing tile-specific beam variations.
Findings
Good agreement with the FEE model (~1dB accuracy)
Detected a missing dipole effect in a tile's beam shape
Validated the measurement approach for future beam characterization
Abstract
We provide the first in situ measurements of antenna element (tile) beam shapes of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA), a low radio-frequency interferometer and an SKA precursor. Most current MWA processing pipelines use an assumed beam shape, errors in which can cause absolute and relative flux density errors, as well as polarisation 'leakage'. This makes understanding the primary beam of paramount importance, especially for sensitive experiments such as a measurement of the 21 cm line from the epoch of reionisation (EoR). The calibration requirements for measuring the EoR 21 cm line are so extreme that tile to tile beam variations may affect our ability to make a detection. Measuring the primary beam shape from visibilities alone is challenging, as multiple instrumental, atmospheric, and astrophysical factors contribute to uncertainties in the data. Building on the methods of Neben et…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
