3D hydrodynamic simulations of C ingestion into a convective O shell
Robert Andrassy (1,2,3), Falk Herwig (1,2), Paul Woodward (4,2),, Christian Ritter (1,2) ((1) University of Victoria, (2) JINA-CEE, (3), Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, (4) University of Minnesota)

TL;DR
This study uses 3D hydrodynamic simulations to explore how carbon is ingested into a convective oxygen shell in massive stars, revealing complex flow behaviors, energy contributions, and potential implications for supernova progenitors.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed 3D simulations of C ingestion into an O shell, including nuclear feedback, and compares different resolutions and reaction networks to assess their effects.
Findings
Entrainment rate and convective velocity scale with total luminosity.
Carbon burning contributes up to 33% of total luminosity.
Large-scale oscillations develop under increased energy yield, indicating potential for violent shell mergers.
Abstract
Interactions between convective shells in evolved massive stars have been linked to supernova impostors, to the production of the odd-Z elements Cl, K, and Sc, and they might also help generate the large-scale asphericities that are known to facilitate shock revival in supernova explosion models. We investigate the process of ingestion of C-shell material into a convective O-burning shell, including the hydrodynamic feedback from the nuclear burning of the ingested material. Our 3D hydrodynamic simulations span almost 3 dex in the total luminosity . All but one of the simulations reach a quasi-stationary state with the entrainment rate and convective velocity proportional to and , respectively. Carbon burning provides -- of the total luminosity, depending on the set of reactions considered. Equivalent simulations done…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
