TL;DR
This study compares different lane-changing schemes in multilane highway traffic models using cellular automata, finding that an asymmetric 'Keep Right Unless Overtaking' model improves traffic flow efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates a hybrid multilane traffic model with asymmetric lane-changing rules, demonstrating its superior efficiency over symmetric and other hybrid schemes.
Findings
Asymmetric model outperforms symmetric and hybrid models in traffic flow.
'Keep Right Unless Overtaking' rule enhances traffic efficiency.
Software package for modeling is freely available.
Abstract
We study effects of lane changing rules on multilane highway traffic using the Nagel-Schreckenberg cellular automaton model with different schemes for combining driving lanes (lanes used by default) and overtaking lanes. Three schemes are considered: a symmetric model, in which all lanes are driving lanes, an asymmetric model, in which the right lane is a driving lane and the other lanes are overtaking lanes, a hybrid model, in which the leftmost lane is an overtaking lane and all the other lanes are driving lanes. In a driving lane vehicles follow symmetric rules for lane changes to the left and to the right, while in an overtaking lane vehicles follow asymmetric lane changing rules. We test these schemes for three- and four-lane traffic mixed with some low-speed vehicles (having a lower maximum speed) in a closed system with periodic boundary conditions as well as in an open system…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
