Metrics for describing dyadic movement: a review
Rocio Joo, Marie-Pierre Etienne, Nicolas Bez, St\'ephanie Mah\'evas

TL;DR
This review critically evaluates twelve metrics for analyzing pairwise joint movement in ecology, focusing on their theoretical properties, practical use, and ability to measure proximity and coordination.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of existing metrics for dyadic movement, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and suitability for different aspects of joint behavior.
Findings
Some metrics effectively measure proximity in space-time.
Other metrics are more sensitive to movement coordination.
A graphical tool helps select appropriate metrics based on study focus.
Abstract
In movement ecology, the few works that have taken collective behaviour into account are data-driven and rely on simplistic theoretical assumptions, relying in metrics that may or may not be measuring what is intended. In the present paper, we focus on pairwise joint-movement behaviour, where individuals move together during at least a segment of their path. We investigate the adequacy of twelve metrics introduced in previous works for assessing joint movement by analysing their theoretical properties and confronting them with contrasting case scenarios. Three criteria are taken into account for review of those metrics: 1) practical use, 2) dependence on parameters and underlying assumptions, and 3) computational cost. When analysing the similarities between the metrics as defined, we show how some of them can be expressed using general mathematical forms. In addition, we evaluate the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
