Optical follow-up observation of Fast Radio Burst 151230

TL;DR

This study conducted deep optical follow-up observations of FRB 151230 to search for afterglows, identifying several candidates but finding no conclusive optical counterpart, thus constraining possible progenitor models.

Contribution

It presents the deepest optical follow-up of an FRB to date, systematically analyzing candidate counterparts and constraining the association with supernovae or other transient phenomena.

Findings

No confirmed optical counterpart to FRB 151230 was found.

Several transient candidates are consistent with AGNs or supernovae, but none are definitive.

The results limit the host galaxy's dispersion measure and rule out Type Ia supernovae as the FRB's origin.

Abstract

The origin of fast radio bursts (FRBs), bright millisecond radio transients, is still somewhat of a mystery. Several theoretical models expect that the FRB accompanies an optical afterglow (e.g., Totani 2013; Kashiyama et al. 2013). In order to investigate the origin of FRBs, we perform $gri$-band follow-up observations of FRB~151230 (estimated $z \lesssim 0.8$) with Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam at $8$, $11$, and $14$~days after discovery. The follow-up observation reaches a $50\%$ completeness magnitude of $26.5$~mag for point sources, which is the deepest optical follow-up of FRBs to date. We find $13$ counterpart candidates with variabilities during the observation. We investigate their properties with multicolor and multi-wavelength observations and archival catalogs. Two candidates are excluded by the non-detection of FRB~151230 in the other radio feed horns that operated simultaneously to the detection, as well as the inconsistency between the photometric redshift and that derived from the dispersion measure of FRB~151230. Eight further candidates are consistent with optical variability seen in AGNs. Two more candidates are well fitted with transient templates (Type IIn supernovae), and the final candidate is poorly fitted with all of our transient templates and is located off-center of an extended source. It can only be reproduced with rapid transients with a faint peak and rapid decline and the probability of chance coincidence is $\sim3.6\%$. We also find that none of our candidates are consistent with Type Ia supernovae, which rules out the association of Type Ia supernovae to FRB~151230 at $z\leq0.6$ and limits the dispersion measure of the host galaxy to $\lesssim300$~pc~cm$^{-3}$ in a Type Ia supernova scenario.