A type of simulation which some experimental evidence suggests we don't live in

TL;DR

This paper presents an argument based on experimental evidence suggesting that we do not live in a specific type of computer simulation, challenging certain simulation hypotheses.

Contribution

It introduces empirical evidence that rules out a particular class of computer simulations, advancing the debate on the nature of our reality.

Findings

Experimental results exclude a specific simulation type

Provides empirical basis against certain simulation hypotheses

Supports the possibility that we do not live in a simulation

Abstract

Do we live in a computer simulation? I will present an argument that the results of a certain experiment constitute empirical evidence that we do not live in, at least, one type of simulation. The type of simulation ruled out is very specific. Perhaps that is the price one must pay to make any kind of Popperian progress.