Fundamental Principles for Calculating Charged Defect Ionization Energies in Ultrathin Two-Dimensional Materials
Tyler J. Smart, Feng Wu, Marco Govoni, and Yuan Ping

TL;DR
This paper establishes fundamental principles for accurately calculating charged defect ionization energies in ultrathin 2D materials, addressing challenges posed by reduced dielectric screening and proposing robust reference levels and hybrid functional tuning.
Contribution
It introduces a method using vacuum level as a reference and enforces the generalized Koopmans' condition to determine Fock exchange fractions, improving the accuracy of defect ionization energy predictions in 2D materials.
Findings
Fock exchange fractions vary significantly between bulk and monolayer h-BN.
The proposed methods yield band gaps consistent with experimental and GW results.
Increasing layers in h-BN lowers defect ionization energies systematically.
Abstract
Defects in 2D materials are becoming prominent candidates for quantum emitters and scalable optoelectronic applications. However, several physical properties that characterize their behavior, such as charged defect ionization energies, are difficult to simulate with conventional first-principles methods, mainly because of the weak and anisotropic dielectric screening caused by the reduced dimensionality. We establish fundamental principles for accurate and efficient calculations of charged defect ionization energies and electronic structure in ultrathin 2D materials. We propose to use the vacuum level as the reference for defect charge transition levels (CTLs) because it gives robust results insensitive to the level of theory, unlike commonly used band edge positions. Furthermore, we determine the fraction of Fock exchange in hybrid functionals for accurate band gaps and band edge…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
