OGLE-2014-BLG-1186: gravitational microlensing providing evidence for a planet orbiting the foreground star or for a close binary source?
M. Dominik, E. Bachelet, V. Bozza, R. A. Street, C. Han, M., Hundertmark, A. Udalski, D. M. Bramich, K. A. Alsubai, S. Calchi Novati, S., Ciceri, G. D'Ago, R. Figuera Jaimes, T. Haugb{\o}lle, T. C. Hinse, K. Horne,, U. G. J{\o}rgensen, D. Juncher, N. Kains, H. Korhonen

TL;DR
This paper develops a robust methodology to analyze long gravitational microlensing events, distinguishing between planetary and binary source or lens scenarios, and applies it to OGLE-2014-BLG-1186 to infer the nature of the lensing object.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive approach for identifying the nature of deviations in microlensing light curves, enabling robust discrimination between planetary and binary source or lens models.
Findings
Detected a possible planet of 45 Earth masses orbiting a 0.35 solar mass star.
Identified an alternative binary-source model involving a brown dwarf lens.
Proposed observational strategies to resolve model ambiguities.
Abstract
(abridged) Using the particularly long gravitational microlensing event OGLE-2014-BLG-1186 with a time-scale ~ 300 d, we present a methodology for identifying the nature of localised deviations from single-lens point-source light curves, which ensures that 1) the claimed signal is substantially above the noise floor, 2) the inferred properties are robustly determined and their estimation not subject to confusion with systematic noise in the photometry, 3) there are no alternative viable solutions within the model framework that might have been missed. Annual parallax and binarity could be separated and robustly measured from the wing and the peak data, respectively. We find matching model light curves that involve either a binary lens or a binary source. Our binary-lens models indicate a planet of mass = (45 9) , orbiting a star of mass = (0.35…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
