Random tree recursions: which fixed points correspond to tangible sets of trees?
Tobias Johnson, Moumanti Podder, Fiona Skerman

TL;DR
This paper investigates fixed points of recursive properties in Galton-Watson trees, classifying solutions based on their probabilistic interpretations using spine decompositions and Boolean function analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for understanding fixed points of recursive tree properties and classifies solutions by their probabilistic significance.
Findings
Multiple fixed points can exist for the recursive property.
Not all fixed points correspond to actual probabilities of tree properties.
The framework distinguishes between meaningful probabilistic solutions and mathematical artifacts.
Abstract
Let be the set of rooted trees containing an infinite binary subtree starting at the root. This set satisfies the metaproperty that a tree belongs to it if and only if its root has children and such that the subtrees rooted at and belong to it. Let be the probability that a Galton-Watson tree falls in . The metaproperty makes satisfy a fixed-point equation, which can have multiple solutions. One of these solutions is , but what is the meaning of the others? In particular, are they probabilities of the Galton-Watson tree falling into other sets satisfying the same metaproperty? We create a framework for posing questions of this sort, and we classify solutions to fixed-point equations according to whether they admit probabilistic interpretations. Our proofs use spine decompositions of Galton-Watson trees and the analysis of Boolean…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
