Feature Dimensionality Reduction for Video Affect Classification: A Comparative Study
Chenfeng Guo, Dongrui Wu

TL;DR
This study compares five dimensionality reduction methods for video affect classification, revealing no single best approach and suggesting raw features can sometimes be effective.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of popular dimensionality reduction techniques in affective computing, highlighting their relative performances.
Findings
No approach universally outperforms others.
Using raw features directly can sometimes be effective.
Dimensionality reduction remains a critical challenge in affect classification.
Abstract
Affective computing has become a very important research area in human-machine interaction. However, affects are subjective, subtle, and uncertain. So, it is very difficult to obtain a large number of labeled training samples, compared with the number of possible features we could extract. Thus, dimensionality reduction is critical in affective computing. This paper presents our preliminary study on dimensionality reduction for affect classification. Five popular dimensionality reduction approaches are introduced and compared. Experiments on the DEAP dataset showed that no approach can universally outperform others, and performing classification using the raw features directly may not always be a bad choice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEmotion and Mood Recognition · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Face and Expression Recognition
