Nonpositive curvature is not coarsely universal
Alexandros Eskenazis, Manor Mendel, Assaf Naor

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that not all metric spaces can be coarsely embedded into Alexandrov spaces of nonpositive curvature, contrasting with the positive result for nonnegative curvature, and introduces new bounds on bi-Lipschitz distortions related to metric cotype and barycentric properties.
Contribution
It proves that certain metric spaces cannot be coarsely embedded into nonpositive curvature spaces, providing sharp bounds on embeddings and distortions using nonlinear martingale inequalities.
Findings
Not all metric spaces embed coarsely into nonpositive curvature spaces.
Established sharp bounds on bi-Lipschitz distortion of $oldsymbol{ ext{l}_oldsymbol{ extinfty}}$ grids into $oldsymbol{ ext{l}_q}$.
Disproved a universal embedding property for Alexandrov spaces of nonpositive curvature.
Abstract
We prove that not every metric space embeds coarsely into an Alexandrov space of nonpositive curvature. This answers a question of Gromov (1993) and is in contrast to the fact that any metric space embeds coarsely into an Alexandrov space of nonnegative curvature, as shown by Andoni, Naor and Neiman (2015). We establish this statement by proving that a metric space which is -barycentric for some has metric cotype with sharp scaling parameter. Our proof utilizes nonlinear (metric space-valued) martingale inequalities and yields sharp bounds even for some classical Banach spaces. This allows us to evaluate the bi-Lipschitz distortion of the grid into for all , from which we deduce the following discrete converse to the fact that embeds with distortion …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
