The Close Binary Fraction of Solar-type Stars is Strongly Anti-correlated with Metallicity
Maxwell Moe, Kaitlin M. Kratter, and Carles Badenes

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that the intrinsic close binary fraction of solar-type stars decreases significantly with increasing metallicity, revealing a strong anti-correlation across multiple surveys after correcting for biases.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis correcting for selection biases across five surveys, establishing a consistent anti-correlation between binary fraction and metallicity, and offers theoretical models explaining this trend.
Findings
Close binary fraction decreases from 53% at [Fe/H] = -3.0 to 10% at [Fe/H] = +0.5.
APOGEE RV variability and Kepler EB fractions both decline by factors of about 4 across the metallicity range.
The trend is explained by fragmentation models, with implications for binary evolution in various environments.
Abstract
There is now strong evidence that the close binary fraction (P < 10 days; a < 10 AU) of solar-type stars ( = 0.6-1.5M) decreases significantly with metallicity. Although early surveys showed that the observed spectroscopic binary (SB) fractions in the galactic disk and halo are similar (e.g., Carney-Latham sample), these studies did not correct for incompleteness. In this study, we examine five different surveys and thoroughly account for their underlying selection biases to measure the intrinsic occurrence rate of close solar-type binaries. We re-analyze: (1) a volume-limited sample of solar-type stars, (2) an SB survey of high-proper-motion stars, (3) various SB samples of metal-poor giants, (4) the APOGEE survey of radial velocity (RV) variables, and (5) Kepler eclipsing binaries (EBs). The observed APOGEE RV variability fraction and Kepler EB fraction both…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
