Thermodynamic properties of the Shastry-Sutherland model from quantum Monte Carlo simulations
Stefan Wessel, Ido Niesen, Jonas Stapmanns, B. Normand, Fr\'ed\'eric, Mila, Philippe Corboz, Andreas Honecker

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that quantum Monte Carlo simulations of the frustrated Shastry-Sutherland model can be significantly improved by exploiting a basis transformation, enabling accurate thermodynamic property calculations at low temperatures.
Contribution
The study introduces a basis formulation that reduces the sign problem in QMC for the Shastry-Sutherland model, allowing precise thermodynamic analysis across a range of couplings.
Findings
Sign problem becomes negligible at low temperatures for certain coupling ratios.
QMC results agree with tensor-network and exact diagonalization data.
Thermodynamic properties are accurately computed up to a coupling ratio of 0.526.
Abstract
We investigate the minus-sign problem that afflicts quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations of frustrated quantum spin systems, focusing on spin S=1/2, two spatial dimensions, and the extended Shastry-Sutherland model. We show that formulating the Hamiltonian in the diagonal dimer basis leads to a sign problem that becomes negligible at low temperatures for small and intermediate values of the ratio of the inter- and intradimer couplings. This is a consequence of the fact that the product state of dimer singlets is the exact ground state both of the extended Shastry-Sutherland model and of a corresponding "sign-problem-free" model, obtained by changing the signs of all positive off-diagonal matrix elements in the dimer basis. By exploiting this insight, we map the sign problem throughout the extended parameter space from the Shastry-Sutherland to the fully frustrated bilayer model and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
