Velocity selected production of $2^3S$ metastable positronium
C. Amsler, M. Antonello, A. Belov, G. Bonomi, R. S. Brusa, M. Caccia,, A. Camper, R. Caravita, F. Castelli, G. Cerchiari, D. Comparat, G. Consolati,, A. Demetrio, L. Di Noto, M. Doser, M. Fan\`i, S. Gerber, A. Gligorova, F., Guatieri, P. Hackstock, S. Haider, A. Hinterberger

TL;DR
This work demonstrates a method to produce velocity-selected $2^3S$ metastable positronium atoms with controlled velocities and efficiencies, enabling potential applications in interferometry and fundamental physics experiments.
Contribution
The paper introduces a velocity selection technique for $2^3S$ positronium via delayed UV laser excitation, achieving near-monochromatic beams with specific velocity ranges.
Findings
Achieved $2^3S$ positronium production with 0.8% to 1.7% efficiency.
Measured a branching ratio of (9.7 ± 2.7)% for the $3^3P$ to $2^3S$ decay.
Produced nearly monochromatic $2^3S$ beams with velocity spread < 10^4 m/s.
Abstract
Positronium in the metastable state exhibits a low electrical polarizability and a long lifetime (1140 ns) making it a promising candidate for interferometry experiments with a neutral matter-antimatter system. In the present work, positronium is produced - in absence of electric field - via spontaneous radiative decay from the level populated with a 205nm UV laser pulse. Thanks to the short temporal length of the pulse, 1.5 ns full-width at half maximum, different velocity populations of a positronium cloud emitted from a nanochannelled positron/positronium converter were selected by delaying the excitation pulse with respect to the production instant. positronium atoms with velocity tuned between m/s and m/s were thus produced. Depending on the selected velocity, a production effciency ranging from …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
