Post-correlation beamformer for time-domain studies of pulsars and transients
Jayanta Roy, Jayaram N. Chengalur, Ue-Li Pen

TL;DR
This paper analyzes post-correlation beamforming for pulsar and transient studies, demonstrating its advantages over traditional methods in sensitivity, noise reduction, and calibration, with practical applications to GMRT surveys.
Contribution
It introduces and compares two modes of post-correlation beamforming, highlighting their benefits and computational considerations for pulsar and FRB observations.
Findings
Post-correlation beamforming significantly increases signal-to-noise ratio.
Reduces false triggers from RFI and noise.
Enhances survey sensitivity, especially for slow pulsars.
Abstract
We present a detailed analysis of post-correlation beamforming (i.e. beamforming which involves only phased sums of the correlation of the voltages of different antennas in an array), and compare it with the traditionally used incoherent and phased beamforming techniques. Using data from the GMRT we show that post-correlation beamformation results in a many-folds increase in the signal-to-noise for periodic signals from pulsars and several order of magnitude reduction in the number of false triggers from single pulse events like fast radio bursts (FRBs). This difference arises primarily because the post-correlation beam contains less red-noise, as well as less radio frequency interference. The post-correlation beam can also be more easily calibrated than the incoherent or phased array beams. We also discuss two different modes of post-correlation beamformation, viz. (1) by subtracting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
