A Highly Linear Calibration Metric for TES X-ray Microcalorimeters
C.G. Pappas, J.W. Fowler, D.A. Bennett, W.B. Doriese, Y.I. Joe, K.M., Morgan, G.C. O'Neil, J.N. Ullom, D.S. Swetz

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new calibration metric, $E_{Joule}$, for TES X-ray microcalorimeters that exhibits significantly improved linearity over the traditional OFPH metric, reducing calibration errors and effort.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that $E_{Joule}$ provides a nearly linear calibration metric, outperforming OFPH in linearity and accuracy for TES X-ray microcalorimeters.
Findings
$E_{Joule}$ fits a linear function an order of magnitude better than OFPH.
Calibration functions using $E_{J}$ are linear within 2-3 eV noise.
$E_{Joule}$ reduces calibration errors and measurement complexity.
Abstract
Transition-edge sensor X-ray microcalorimeters are usually calibrated empirically, as the most widely-used calibration metric, optimal filtered pulse height (OFPH), in general has an unknown dependance on photon energy, . Because the calibration function can only be measured at specific points where photons of a known energy can be produced, this unknown dependence of OFPH on leads to calibration errors and the need for time-intensive calibration measurements and analysis. A calibration metric that is nearly linear as a function of could help alleviate these problems. In this work, we assess the linearity of a physically motivated calibration metric, . We measure calibration pulses in the range 4.5 keV9.6 keV with detectors optimized for 6 keV photons to compare the linearity properties of to OFPH. In these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
