Estimating the NEMA characteristics of the J-PET tomograph using the GATE package
Pawe{\l} Kowalski, Wojciech Wi\'slicki, Roman Shopa, Lech Raczy\'nski,, Konrad Klimaszewski, Catalina Curceanu, Eryk Czerwi\'nski, Kamil Dulski,, Aleksander Gajos, Marek Gorgol, Neha Gupta-Sharma, Beatrix Hiesmayr, Bo\.zena, Jasi\'nska, {\L}ukasz Kap{\l}on, Daria Kami\'nska

TL;DR
This paper uses GATE simulations to estimate NEMA characteristics of a novel plastic scintillator-based J-PET whole-body PET system, optimizing its design for improved spatial resolution, sensitivity, and count rate performance.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed NEMA-compliant simulation-based analysis of the J-PET prototype, exploring various geometries and readouts to optimize PET performance.
Findings
Spatial resolution (FWHM) of 3 mm radially and tangentially, 6 mm axially.
NECR peak of 300 kcps at 40 kBq/cc activity.
Sensitivity of 14.9 cps/kBq at the center.
Abstract
The novel whole-body PET system based on plastic scintillators is developed by the {J-PET} Collaboration. It consists of plastic scintillator strips arranged axially in the form of a cylinder, allowing the cost-effective construction of the total-body PET. In order to determine properties of the scanner prototype and optimize its geometry, advanced computer simulations using the GATE software were performed. The spatial resolution, the sensitivity, the scatter fraction and the noise equivalent count rate were estimated according to the NEMA norm as a function of the length of the tomograph, number of the detection layers, diameter of the tomographic chamber and for various types of the applied readout. For the single-layer geometry with the diameter of 85 cm, strip length of 100 cm, cross-section of 4 mm x 20 mm and silicon photomultipliers with the additional layer of wavelength…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
