Intrinsic core level photoemission of suspended graphene
Toma Susi, Mattia Scardamaglia, Kimmo Mustonen, Andreas Mittelberger,, Mohamed Al-Hada, Matteo Amati, Hikmet Sezen, Patrick Zeller, Ask H. Larsen,, Clemens Mangler, Jannik C. Meyer, Luca Gregoratti, Carla Bittencourt, Jani, Kotakoski

TL;DR
This study precisely measures the intrinsic core level photoemission of suspended graphene, revealing layer-dependent shifts and providing insights into charge redistribution and screening effects in graphene layers.
Contribution
It combines advanced microscopy and spectroscopy techniques to accurately assign photoemission signals to specific graphene layers, a novel approach for this material.
Findings
Monolayer graphene's core level at 284.70 eV, 0.28 eV higher than graphite
Layer-dependent core level shifts observed in multilayer graphene
Density functional theory partially explains the experimental shifts
Abstract
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of graphene is important both for its characterization and as a model for other carbon materials. Despite great recent interest, the intrinsic photoemission of its single layer has not been unambiguously measured, nor is the layer-dependence in free-standing multilayers accurately determined. We combine scanning transmission electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy with synchrotron-based scanning photoelectron microscopy to characterize the same areas of suspended graphene samples down to the atomic level. This allows us to assign spectral signals to regions of precisely known layer number and purity. The core level binding energy of the monolayer is measured at 284.70 eV, thus 0.28 eV higher than that of graphite, with intermediate values found for few layers. This trend is reproduced by density functional theory with or without explicit van der Waals…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
