On the Security Analysis of a Cooperative Incremental Relaying Protocol in the Presence of an Active Eavesdropper
Saeed Vahidian, Sajad Hatamnia, and Benoit Champagne

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the physical-layer security of a cooperative wireless network with active eavesdroppers using artificial noise, proposing relay selection schemes to enhance secrecy capacity and demonstrating their effectiveness through analytical and simulation results.
Contribution
It introduces a decode-and-forward incremental relaying protocol with relay selection schemes tailored for active eavesdroppers transmitting artificial noise, providing exact closed-form expressions for security metrics.
Findings
Proposed IR-based relay selection schemes outperform existing methods.
Artificial noise creates a secrecy outage floor without relay assistance.
Analytical expressions accurately predict the schemes' performance.
Abstract
Physical layer security offers an efficient means to decrease the risk of confidential information leakage through wiretap links. In this paper, we address the physical-layer security in a cooperative wireless subnetwork that includes a source-destination pair and multiple relays, exchanging information in the presence of a malevolent eavesdropper. Specifically, the eavesdropper is active in the network and transmits artificial noise (AN) with a multiple-antenna transmitter to confound both the relays and the destination. We first analyse the secrecy capacity of the direct source-to-destination transmission in terms of intercept probability (IP) and secrecy outage probability (SOP). A decode-and-forward incremental relaying (IR) protocol is then introduced to improve reliability and security of communications in the presence of the active eavesdropper. Within this context, and depending…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
