Calibrated, cosmological hydrodynamical simulations with variable IMFs III: Spatially-resolved properties and evolution
Christopher Barber, Joop Schaye, Robert A. Crain

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological hydrodynamical simulations with variable IMFs to reproduce and analyze spatially-resolved properties and evolution of massive early-type galaxies, matching observed radial IMF gradients and metallicity profiles.
Contribution
It introduces self-consistent, environment-dependent IMF variations in simulations, providing insights into radial IMF gradients and their relation to galaxy properties.
Findings
Both simulations produce negative radial IMF gradients consistent with observations.
The simulations show negative metallicity gradients and distinct [Mg/Fe] profiles.
The local mass-to-light ratio correlates with metallicity and [Mg/Fe] differently in the two models.
Abstract
Recent spatially-resolved observations of massive early-type galaxies (ETGs) have uncovered evidence for radial gradients of the stellar initial mass function (IMF), ranging from super-Salpeter IMFs in the centre to Milky Way-like beyond the half-light radius, . We compare these findings with our new cosmological, hydrodynamical simulations based on the EAGLE model that self-consistently vary the IMF on a per-particle basis such that it becomes either bottom-heavy (LoM-50) or top-heavy (HiM-50) in high-pressure environments. These simulations were calibrated to reproduce inferred IMF variations such that the IMF becomes "heavier" due to either excess dwarf stars or stellar remnants, respectively, in galaxies with increasing stellar velocity dispersion. In agreement with observations, both simulations produce negative radial IMF gradients, transitioning from high to low excess…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
