On L-shaped point set embeddings of trees: first non-embeddable examples
Torsten M\"utze, Manfred Scheucher

TL;DR
This paper presents the first known examples of trees requiring more points than vertices for L-shaped embeddings, establishing new lower bounds and exploring ordered tree embeddings.
Contribution
It provides the first non-trivial lower bounds for L-shaped embeddings of trees and analyzes ordered trees, including infinite families of non-embeddable cases.
Findings
Trees with 13-20 vertices can require more points than vertices for embedding.
All trees with up to 12 vertices can be embedded in any point set of the same size.
An infinite family of ordered trees does not always admit L-shaped embeddings.
Abstract
An L-shaped embedding of a tree in a point set is a planar drawing of the tree where the vertices are mapped to distinct points and every edge is drawn as a sequence of two axis-aligned line segments. There has been considerable work on establishing upper bounds on the minimum cardinality of a point set to guarantee that any tree of the same size with maximum degree 4 admits an L-shaped embedding on the point set. However, no non-trivial lower bound is known to this date, i.e., no known -vertex tree requires more than points to be embedded. In this paper, we present the first examples of -vertex trees for that require strictly more points than vertices to admit an L-shaped embedding. Moreover, using computer help, we show that every tree on vertices admits an L-shaped embedding in every set of points. We also consider embedding…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Optimization and Packing Problems
