Conservativity of realizations implies that numerical motives are Kimura-finite and motivic zeta functions are rational
Mikhail V. Bondarko

TL;DR
The paper demonstrates that if certain realization functors are conservative, then motivic zeta functions are rational and numerical motives are Kimura-finite, leading to a Tannakian structure of the category of numerical motives.
Contribution
It establishes a link between the conservativity of realization functors and the rationality of motivic zeta functions and Kimura-finiteness of numerical motives, under recent cohomological assumptions.
Findings
Motivic zeta functions are rational under conservative realizations.
Numerical motives are Kimura-finite if realization functors are conservative.
The category of numerical motives is essentially Tannakian.
Abstract
We prove: if the (\'etale or de Rham) realization functor is conservative on the category of Voevodsky motives with rational coefficients then motivic zeta functions of arbitrary varieties are rational and numerical motives are Kimura-finite. The latter statement immediately implies that the category of numerical motives is (essentially) Tannakian. This observation becomes actual due to the recent announcement of J. Ayoub that the De Rham cohomology realization is conservative on whenever . We apply this statement to exterior powers of motives coming from generic hyperplane sections of smooth affine varieties.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
