A New, Long-Lived, Jupiter Mesoscale Wave Observed at Visible Wavelengths

TL;DR

This paper reports the discovery and analysis of long-lived mesoscale waves on Jupiter, observed at multiple wavelengths, likely representing inertia-gravity waves generated by vortex interactions and other atmospheric processes.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed observation of Jupiter's mesoscale waves across multiple wavelengths and links them to inertia-gravity wave phenomena through analysis and modeling.

Findings

Waves have ~1.2° wavelength and slow westward phase speeds.

Waves are consistent with inertia-gravity waves at 500-mbar level.

Multiple mechanisms may generate these waves, including vortex interactions.

Abstract

Small-scale waves were observed along the boundary between Jupiter's North Equatorial Belt and North Tropical Zone, ~16.5{\deg} N planetographic latitude in Hubble Space Telescope data in 2012 and throughout 2015 to 2018, observable at all wavelengths from the UV to the near IR. At peak visibility, the waves have sufficient contrast (~10%) to be observed from ground-based telescopes. They have a typical wavelength of about 1.2{\deg} (1400 km), variable-length wave trains, and westward phase speeds of a few m/s or less. New analysis of Voyager 2 data shows similar wave trains over at least 300 hours. Some waves appear curved when over cyclones and anticyclones, but most are straight, but tilted, shifting in latitude as they pass vortices. Based on their wavelengths, phase speeds, and faint appearance at high-altitude sensitive passbands, the observed NEB waves are consistent with inertia-gravity waves at the 500-mbar pressure level, though formation altitude is not well constrained. Preliminary General Circulation Model simulations generate inertia-gravity waves from vortices interacting with the environment and can reproduce the observed wavelengths and orientations. Several mechanisms can generate these waves, and all may contribute: geostrophic adjustment of cyclones; cyclone/anticyclone interactions; wind interactions with obstructions or heat pulses from convection; or changing vertical wind shear. However, observations also show that the presence of vortices and/or regions of convection are not sufficient by themselves for wave formation, implying that a change in vertical structure may affect their stability, or that changes in haze properties may affect their visibility.