Relating VFCs on thin compactifications
Eleny-Nicoleta Ionel, Thomas H. Parker

TL;DR
This paper extends the theory of relative fundamental classes (RFCs) for moduli spaces in geometric analysis, showing their naturality, compatibility with other invariants, and equivalence with Pardon's virtual fundamental class in various settings.
Contribution
It generalizes the concept of RFCs beyond stratified cases, proving their naturality and compatibility with pseudo-cycles, cutdown spaces, and Pardon's VFC.
Findings
RFCs agree with pseudo-cycle invariants
RFCs are compatible with cutdown moduli spaces
RFCs coincide with Pardon's virtual fundamental class
Abstract
Many moduli spaces that occur in geometric analysis admit "Fredholm-stratified thin compactifications" in the sense of [IP1] and hence admit a relative fundamental class (RFC), also as defined in [IP1]. We extend these results, emphasizing the naturality of the RFC, eliminating the need for a stratification, and proving three compatibility results: the invariants defined by the RFC agree with those defined by pseudo-cycles, the RFC is compatible with cutdown moduli spaces, and the RFC agrees with the virtual fundamental class (VFC) constructed by J. Pardon via implicit atlases in all cases where both are defined.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
