Thermonuclear explosions of rapidly differentially rotating white dwarfs: Candidates for superluminous Type Ia supernovae?
M. Fink, M. Kromer, W. Hillebrandt, F. K. Roepke, R. Pakmor, I. R., Seitenzahl, S. A. Sim

TL;DR
This study investigates how different explosion mechanisms of rapidly rotating white dwarfs could explain superluminous Type Ia supernovae, finding that detonations produce overly bright events inconsistent with observations, while deflagrations resemble certain subtypes.
Contribution
It provides the first consistent synthetic observables from models of differentially rotating white dwarf explosions, exploring various detonation and deflagration scenarios.
Findings
Detonation models produce very bright, inconsistent supernovae.
Pure deflagrations resemble 2002cx-like supernovae.
Detonation scenarios do not match known Type Ia subclasses.
Abstract
The observed sub-class of "superluminous" Type Ia supernovae lacks a convincing theoretical explanation. If the emission of such objects were powered exclusively by radioactive decay of 56Ni formed in the explosion, a progenitor mass close to or even above the Chandrasekhar limit for a non-rotating white dwarf star would be required. Masses significantly exceeding this limit can be supported by differential rotation. We, therefore, explore explosions and predict observables for various scenarios resulting from differentially rotating carbon-oxygen white dwarfs close to their respective limit of stability. Specifically, we have investigated a prompt detonation model, detonations following an initial deflagration phase ("delayed detonation" models), and a pure deflagration model. In postprocessing steps, we performed nucleosynthesis and three-dimensional radiative transfer calculations,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
