A jet model for the fast IR variability of the black hole X-ray binary GX 339-4
Julien Malzac, Maithili Kalamkar, Federico Vincentelli, Alexis Vue,, Samia Drappeau, Renaud Belmont, Piergiorgio Casella, Ma\"ica Clavel,, St\'ephane Corbel Micka\"el Coriat Damien Dornic, Jonathan Ferreira, Gilles, Henri, Thomas J. Maccarone, Alexandre Marcowith, Kieran O'Brien

TL;DR
This study models the IR and X-ray variability of GX 339-4 using a jet internal shock model, successfully reproducing timing features and suggesting a mildly relativistic jet with a connection to accretion flow fluctuations.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive jet model that explains IR/X-ray timing correlations and LFQPOs in GX 339-4, linking jet dynamics to accretion flow variability.
Findings
IR lag of about 100 ms explained by jet travel time
Jet is at most mildly relativistic with Γ<3
Jet precession can produce observed IR LFQPOs
Abstract
Using the simultaneous Infra-Red (IR) and X-ray light curves obtained by Kalamkar et al. (2016), we perform a Fourier analysis of the IR/X-ray timing correlations of the black hole X-ray binary (BHB) GX 339-4. The resulting IR vs X-ray Fourier coherence and lag spectra are similar to those obtained in previous studies of GX 339-4 using optical light curves. In particular, above 1 Hz, the lag spectrum features an approximately constant IR lag of about 100 ms. We model simultaneously the radio to IR Spectral Energy Distribution (SED), the IR Power Spectral Density (PSD), and the coherence and lag spectra using the jet internal shock model ISHEM assuming that the fluctuations of the jet Lorentz factor are driven by the accretion flow. It turns out that most of the spectral and timing features, including the 100 ms lag, are remarkably well reproduced by this model. The 100 ms time-scale is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
