Response to comment on "An excess of massive stars in the local 30 Doradus starburst"
F.R.N. Schneider, H. Sana, C.J. Evans, J.M. Bestenlehner, N. Castro,, L. Fossati, G. Gr\"afener, N. Langer, O.H. Ram\'irez-Agudelo, C., Sab\'in-Sanjuli\'an, S. Sim\'on-D\'iaz, F. Tramper, P.A. Crowther, A. de, Koter, S.E. de Mink, P.L. Dufton, M. Garcia, M. Gieles

TL;DR
This paper defends the original finding of an excess of massive stars in 30 Doradus, clarifying that reanalysis confirms the initial results but underpredicts the number of the most massive stars, reinforcing the conclusion.
Contribution
It provides a response to critiques by reaffirming the excess of massive stars in 30 Doradus using reanalysis data.
Findings
Reanalysis confirms the initial mass function slopes for high-mass stars.
Reanalysis underpredicts the number of stars above 30 solar masses.
The excess of massive stars in 30 Doradus is supported despite methodological differences.
Abstract
Farr and Mandel reanalyse our data, finding initial-mass-function slopes for high mass stars in 30 Doradus that agree with our results. However, their reanalysis appears to underpredict the observed number of massive stars. Their technique results in more precise slopes than in our work, strengthening our conclusion that there is an excess of massive stars above in 30 Doradus.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Scientific Research and Discoveries
