Stronger Tests of the Collapse Locality Loophole in Bell Experiments
Adrian Kent (Centre for Quantum Information, Foundations, DAMTP,, University of Cambridge, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics)

TL;DR
This paper proposes advanced experimental methods to rigorously test the collapse locality loophole in Bell experiments, which is crucial for validating the non-local nature of quantum mechanics across various collapse models.
Contribution
It introduces new techniques applicable to multiple collapse theories, enabling stronger tests of the collapse locality loophole in Bell experiments.
Findings
Techniques applicable to gravitationally induced collapse
Methods for spontaneous localization models
Approaches for consciousness-induced collapse
Abstract
Several versions of quantum theory assume some form of localized collapse. If measurement outcomes are indeed defined by localized collapses, then a loophole-free demonstration of Bell non-locality needs to ensure space-like separated collapses associated with the measurements of the entangled systems. This collapse locality loophole remains largely untested, with one significant exception probing Diosi's and Penrose's gravitationally induced collapse hypotheses. I describe here techniques that allow much stronger experimental tests. These apply to all the well known types of collapse postulate, including gravitationally induced collapse, spontaneous localization models and Wigner's consciousness-induced collapse.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
