Measuring collaborative emergent behavior in multi-agent reinforcement learning
Sean L. Barton, Nicholas R. Waytowich, Erin Zaroukian, and Derrik E., Asher

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new quantitative metric to assess collaboration in multi-agent reinforcement learning, addressing the gap between performance and genuine collaborative behavior, with potential applications in human-agent teaming.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel metric for measuring collaboration in multi-agent RL, which can improve understanding and training of collaborative behaviors.
Findings
The metric effectively distinguishes between performance and true collaboration.
It provides a quantitative tool for evaluating multi-agent cooperation.
Potential to enhance training signals for collaborative behaviors in RL.
Abstract
Multi-agent reinforcement learning (RL) has important implications for the future of human-agent teaming. We show that improved performance with multi-agent RL is not a guarantee of the collaborative behavior thought to be important for solving multi-agent tasks. To address this, we present a novel approach for quantitatively assessing collaboration in continuous spatial tasks with multi-agent RL. Such a metric is useful for measuring collaboration between computational agents and may serve as a training signal for collaboration in future RL paradigms involving humans.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
