Bipartite Causal Inference with Interference
Corwin M. Zigler, Georgia Papadogeorgou

TL;DR
This paper introduces bipartite causal inference with interference, addressing the challenge of evaluating interventions when treatments and outcomes are observed in different units with interconnected effects, exemplified by air pollution's impact on health.
Contribution
It formalizes the bipartite interference setting, develops estimands and a simple inverse probability weighted estimator, and applies these methods to assess air pollution interventions.
Findings
Interventions on power plants causally reduce cardiovascular hospitalizations.
The proposed estimator provides insights into complex interference effects.
Application demonstrates the method's utility in real-world environmental health studies.
Abstract
Statistical methods to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions are increasingly challenged by the inherent interconnectedness of units. Specifically, a recent flurry of methods research has addressed the problem of interference between observations, which arises when one observational unit's outcome depends not only on its treatment but also the treatment assigned to other units. We introduce the setting of bipartite causal inference with interference, which arises when 1) treatments are defined on observational units that are distinct from those at which outcomes are measured and 2) there is interference between units in the sense that outcomes for some units depend on the treatments assigned to many other units. Basic definitions and formulations are provided for this setting, highlighting similarities and differences with more commonly considered settings of causal inference with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
