Black Hole Shadow as a Test of General Relativity: Quadratic Gravity
Dimitry Ayzenberg, Nicolas Yunes

TL;DR
This paper investigates how black hole shadow observations can test deviations from general relativity, focusing on quadratic gravity theories, and finds current constraints are stronger than shadow observations for some models.
Contribution
The study systematically compares black hole shadow constraints with existing bounds on quadratic gravity theories, highlighting the limited current constraining power and potential for future observations.
Findings
Current constraints on Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet gravity are stronger than shadow-based constraints.
Shadow observations of slowly-rotating black holes do not improve existing bounds on dynamical Chern-Simons gravity.
Rapidly-rotating black hole observations could better constrain dynamical Chern-Simons gravity.
Abstract
Observations of the black hole shadow of supermassive black holes, such as Sagittarius A* at the center of our Milky Way galaxy, allow us to study the properties of black holes and the nature of strong-field gravity. According to the Kerr hypothesis, isolated, stationary, and axisymmetric astrophysical black holes are described by the Kerr metric. The Kerr hypothesis holds in General Relativity and in some modified gravity theories, but there are others in which it is violated. In principle, black hole shadow observations can be used to determine if the Kerr metric is the correct description for black holes, and in turn, they could be used to place constraints on modified gravity theories that do not admit the Kerr solution. We here investigate whether black hole shadow observations can constrain deviations from general relativity, focusing on two well-motivated modified quadratic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
