Micron-scale measurements of low anisotropic strain response of local $T_c$ in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$
Christopher A. Watson, Alexandra S. Gibbs, Andrew P. Mackenzie,, Clifford W. Hicks, and Kathryn A. Moler

TL;DR
This study used micron-scale measurements to investigate how local superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ responds to anisotropic strain, revealing a quadratic dependence and challenging some existing models of its order parameter.
Contribution
It provides the first local, high-resolution measurements of $T_c$ versus strain in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$, showing a quadratic response inconsistent with certain two-component order parameter models.
Findings
$T_c$ varies quadratically with strain ($T_c \,\propto\, \epsilon^2$).
No linear cusp in $T_c$ vs. strain was observed.
Results challenge models predicting a linear $T_c$ response for two-component order parameters.
Abstract
Strontium ruthenate (SrRuO) is a multiband superconductor that displays evidence of topological superconductivity, although a model of the order parameter that is consistent with all experiments remains elusive. We integrated a piezoelectric-based strain apparatus with a scanning superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) microscope to map the diamagnetic response of single-crystal SrRuO as a function of temperature, uniaxial pressure, and position with micron-scale spatial resolution. We thereby obtained local measurements of the superconducting transition temperature vs. anisotropic strain with sufficient sensitivity for comparison to theoretical models that assume a uniform order parameter. We found that varies with position and that the locally measured vs. curves are quadratic (),…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
