The Gemini Planet Imager: Looking back over five years and forward to the future
Bruce Macintosh, Jeffrey K. Chilcote, Vanessa P. Bailey, Robert De, Rosa, Eric Nielsen, Andrew Norton, Lisa Poyneer, Jason Wang, J.B. Ruffio,, J.R. Graham, Christian Marois, Dmitry Savransky, and Jean-Pierre Veran

TL;DR
The paper reviews five years of GPI's performance in exoplanet imaging, analyzes key factors affecting its contrast, and discusses future upgrade plans to enhance its capabilities.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive performance summary, identifies main factors influencing contrast, and proposes upgrade options for the Gemini Planet Imager.
Findings
Atmospheric coherence time significantly affects contrast performance.
Dome seeing impacts image quality and contrast.
Planned upgrades aim to improve adaptive optics performance.
Abstract
The Gemini Planet Imager (GPI), a coronagraphic adaptive optics instrument designed for spectroscopy of extrasolar planets, had first light in 2013[13]. After five years, GPI has observed more than 500 stars, producing an extensive library of science images and associated telemetry that can be analyzed to determine performance predictors. We will present a summary of on-sky performance and lessons learned. The two most significant factors determining bright star contrast performance are atmospheric coherence time and the presence of dome seeing. With a possible move to Gemini North, we are planning potential upgrades including a pyramid-sensor based AO system with predictive control; we will summarize upgrade options and the science they would enable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
