TL;DR
This paper introduces computational improvements to Bayesian optimal experiment design, enabling efficient identification of behavioral models, demonstrated through a game experiment showing optimal designs outperform expert-chosen ones in model discrimination.
Contribution
The paper extends a Bayesian optimal experiment design method with two computational enhancements, making it more tractable for practical applications.
Findings
Optimal design reduces data needed to distinguish models
Reinforcement learning best explains human decisions
Behavior not fully captured by Bayesian Nash equilibrium
Abstract
Bayesian optimal experiments that maximize the information gained from collected data are critical to efficiently identify behavioral models. We extend a seminal method for designing Bayesian optimal experiments by introducing two computational improvements that make the procedure tractable: (1) a search algorithm from artificial intelligence that efficiently explores the space of possible design parameters, and (2) a sampling procedure which evaluates each design parameter combination more efficiently. We apply our procedure to a game of imperfect information to evaluate and quantify the computational improvements. We then collect data across five different experimental designs to compare the ability of the optimal experimental design to discriminate among competing behavioral models against the experimental designs chosen by a "wisdom of experts" prediction experiment. We find that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
