Fake news as we feel it: perception and conceptualization of the term "fake news" in the media
Evandro Cunha, Gabriel Magno, Josemar Caetano, Douglas Teixeira,, Virgilio Almeida

TL;DR
This study quantitatively examines how the term "fake news" has evolved in media over eight years, revealing shifts in perception, context, and associated topics, especially after the 2016 US election.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the changing usage and perception of "fake news" in media, highlighting contextual and semantic shifts post-2016.
Findings
Increase in usage of "fake news" over time
Contextual changes after the 2016 US election
Alterations in related vocabulary and sentiment
Abstract
In this article, we quantitatively analyze how the term "fake news" is being shaped in news media in recent years. We study the perception and the conceptualization of this term in the traditional media using eight years of data collected from news outlets based in 20 countries. Our results not only corroborate previous indications of a high increase in the usage of the expression "fake news", but also show contextual changes around this expression after the United States presidential election of 2016. Among other results, we found changes in the related vocabulary, in the mentioned entities, in the surrounding topics and in the contextual polarity around the term "fake news", suggesting that this expression underwent a change in perception and conceptualization after 2016. These outcomes expand the understandings on the usage of the term "fake news", helping to comprehend and more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
