Fundamental figures of merit for engineering Forster resonance energy transfer
Cristian L. Cortes, Zubin Jacob

TL;DR
This paper establishes a rigorous quantum electrodynamic framework for FRET near nanophotonic structures, clarifying the roles of various figures of merit and resolving previous experimental-theoretical discrepancies.
Contribution
It introduces an exact equivalence between quantum electrodynamic and electrostatic models of FRET, redefining key figures of merit and providing a comprehensive theory for controlling FRET with photonic environments.
Findings
Purcell factor is not a relevant figure of merit for FRET.
Suppression of the Purcell factor can enhance FRET efficiency.
Fundamental bounds on FRET figures of merit are derived from material and emitter properties.
Abstract
Over the past 15 years there has been an ongoing debate regarding the influence of the photonic environment on Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). Disparate results corresponding to enhancement, suppression and null effect of the photonic environment have led to a lack of consensus between the traditional theory of FRET and experiments. Here we show that the quantum electrodynamic theory of FRET near an engineered nanophotonic environment is exactly equivalent to an effective near-field model describing electrostatic dipole-dipole interactions. This leads to an intuitive and rigorously exact description of FRET bridging the gap between experimental observations and theoretical interpretations. We show that the widely used concept of the Purcell factor is only important for understanding spontaneous emission and is an incorrect figure of merit for analyzing FRET. To this end, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
