Modernizing use of regression models in physics education research: a review of hierarchical linear modeling
Ben Van Dusen, Jayson Nissen

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of using hierarchical linear models instead of single-level regression models in physics education research to accurately analyze nested data structures and avoid biased conclusions.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical comparison and practical demonstration of hierarchical linear modeling's advantages over traditional regression in physics education data analysis.
Findings
Hierarchical models better account for nested data structures.
Using inappropriate models can bias research findings.
Hierarchical modeling improves the reliability of physics education research.
Abstract
Physics education researchers (PER) often analyze student data with single-level regression models (e.g., linear and logistic regression). However, education datasets can have hierarchical structures, such as students nested within courses, that single-level models fail to account for. The improper use of single-level models to analyze hierarchical datasets can lead to biased findings. Hierarchical models (a.k.a., multi-level models) account for this hierarchical nested structure in the data. In this publication, we outline the theoretical differences between how single-level and multi-level models handle hierarchical datasets. We then present analysis of a dataset from 112 introductory physics courses using both multiple linear regression and hierarchical linear modeling to illustrate the potential impact of using an inappropriate analytical method on PER findings and implications.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
